"Nones" and the common good
This is not a column full of hand-wringing about the moral decay of U.S. society. Nor is it about my concern for the souls of my fellow citizens who are atheists, agnostics, or some other stripe of nonbeliever. I am worried about the growing number of religious “nones” in the United States, but not for those two reasons.
Let me be clear about something before continuing: Many of the people I love and admire most are religious “nones”—those who indicate “none of the above” on religious preference surveys. They include people of high intellect, great sensitivity, and deep character. In fact, many of them could give lessons in such areas to some of the religious people I know.
What they do not do is build hospitals, schools, colleges, or large social service agencies. Such institutions (when not built by the government) have generally been founded and supported by religious communities in the United States. This is not so much because religious people are always better human beings; it’s because religious communities value and organize such work at significant scale.
Religious communities play a profound role in U.S. civil society. About one out of every six patients in the U.S. is treated by Catholic hospitals. Most, if not all, have some sort of explicit commitment to serving the poor because of their faith identity. There are nearly 7,000 Catholic grade schools and high schools in the U.S., and more than 260 colleges. This is to say nothing of the refugee resettlement, the addictions counseling, or the services for homeless men and battered women provided by Catholic social service agencies.
Every faith community in the U.S. has similar institutions. Where would the United States be without its Quaker high schools, its Methodist universities, its Lutheran hospitals, its Jewish social service agencies, and its Southern Baptist disaster relief organizations? As Muslims establish themselves in this country, we are building the same network of faith-inspired service-to-all organizations.
According to Harvard social scientist Robert Putnam, half of U.S. social capital is religiously driven. Three-quarters of our philanthropy goes to a religiously affiliated group of some type or another, many of which do important work in our civil society.
Right now, one out of every five checks “none of the above” on U.S. surveys of religious identity. For those ages 18 to 29, that number is closer to one in four. Further studies by people such as Robert P. Jones at the Public Religion Research Institute show that a sizeable portion of these “nones” believe in God, but very few of them are regular in the pews. They are disconnected from religious communities and, at the end of the day, it is the contributions and civic participation facilitated by religious communities that support all of those faith-based institutions that hold up our civil society. There are interesting attempts by Humanist groups to model congregation-type communities, complete with service projects for the broader society. My friends Greg Epstein and Chris Stedman at the Harvard Humanist Chaplaincy are front and center in this type of positive secular community building. But it’s a long way from a Thanksgiving turkey drive to a hospital.
And so the question remains: What will happen to U.S. civil society as the pews empty out? Who will support all those schools, hospitals, and social service agencies? Who will build new ones?
When I pose this question to social scientists who study these things, they turn to me and say, “I don’t know.” Honestly, I don’t have a better answer.
Courtesy of Sojourners Magazine www.sojo.net. The opinions in this commentary are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the policy or position of the Florida Conference.